Search found 584 matches

by Jim Davis
Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so
Replies: 25
Views: 2768

*stares at watch and counts the minutes until the next Webderland outrage*
by Jim Davis
Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so
Replies: 25
Views: 2768

From Greenfield's blog : Let’s look at stalking law for a minute from the DOJ. Physical stalking is following someone, appearing at a person’s home or place of business, making harassing phone calls, leaving written messages or objects, or vandalizing one’s property. Minus the vandalism part, this i...
by Jim Davis
Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so
Replies: 25
Views: 2768

Good to note you're doing better, Jim, we need your voice in these parts as a counter-influence. When Rich and Rob start agreeing, you know the end is indeed near (it happened, once, a couple of weeks ago. I sat whimpering in the corner for two solid days). Was that why my magnolia bush wept blood ...
by Jim Davis
Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:36 am
Forum: General
Topic: If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so
Replies: 25
Views: 2768

I was just going to start the ball rolling and not reply, but that smacks of setting off a stink bomb and running out of the room, so here I am again. STEVE: Thanks! I've had some health issues, but they're much improved, I'm happy to say. KEITH: I'm going to go out on a limb and say that writing a ...
by Jim Davis
Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so
Replies: 25
Views: 2768

If you're hunting for info on Daniel Greenfield so

Josh Olson can confront him, then you really,

really,

really,

really,

really,

need to get a fucking life.

Much Love,

Jim Davis
by Jim Davis
Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:58 pm
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

Hey, doesn't Ridley Scott say on one of those discs that if you don't think Harrison Ford is a replicant, you deserve to be driven with pikes from your bed in the middle of the night and beaten until you suffocate on your own blood?

(I think I'm only slightly exaggerating, here.)
by Jim Davis
Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: This Sums Up 2007 As Well As Anything I've Seen
Replies: 0
Views: 1144

This Sums Up 2007 As Well As Anything I've Seen

Image

Let's hope 2008 is better, guys. (Wait, it's an election year? Oh, crap . . .)
by Jim Davis
Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:31 pm
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

As usual, you're simplifying things to a grotesque extent, to the point of taking them out of context entirely. If by "simplifying things to a grotesque extent," you mean making relatively clear, logical statements, then perhaps you should follow my lead, because I have no idea what you'r...
by Jim Davis
Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:24 am
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

And I still think that 2007 was one of the best years for movies that I've seen in a long while. So go figure.
by Jim Davis
Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:11 am
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

Cliched, simplistic pap is what Hollywood does , mostly, and I've never understood why, after all these decades, people expect any different. Maybe because the majority of that cliched, simplistic pap came out of a similar attitude of apathy and resigned acceptance? When I have to choose between a ...
by Jim Davis
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:19 pm
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

But no, it wasn't. I do feel the film could've been made live-action using CGI without any detraction from the visual content of the book, and might have enhanced it further. And I was distracted by the format more than a few times while watching, but .. again .. no, it wasn't the rotoscoping. Per ...
by Jim Davis
Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:30 am
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

And I finally ... finally! ... got around to watching A SCANNER DARKLY. ..."eh". (So maybe it's me.) Was it the rotoscoping? As for movies that pleasantly surprised me this year: The Good Shepherd was dark, complex, and as close to a Godfather II as this decade is likely to see. (Though i...
by Jim Davis
Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:59 am
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

As for The Mist and No Country for Old Men , they might have starred Thomas Jane and Tommy Lee Jones, but could you honestly say either of them are of Will Smith's box-office caliber? Or that the films themselves were more successful at the box office? Also, the ending of The Mist wasn't an effecti...
by Jim Davis
Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:32 pm
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

None of those films are what you might call "top-tier". They're still mainstream releases, but nowhere near as publicized as I AM LEGEND. The Mist and No Country For Old Men seem like they were well-publicized to me. If they weren't "top-tier," what was? THE MALTESE FALCON. Off ...
by Jim Davis
Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:22 pm
Forum: Pop Culture
Topic: WARNING!! MOVIE TALK WITH SPOILERS!!!! (YOU BIN WARNED)
Replies: 120
Views: 15658

I'm frightened to death of the current bank-owned climate in Hollywood these days. I mean, not only are movies with deliberate downers (i.e. SEVEN) a certified no-no, any sort of ambiguity is totally forbidden upon threat of career exile. It's gotta be all butterflies, smiles and sunshine... OR ELS...

Go to advanced search